This bareback scene from Bel Ami featuring real-life twin brothers is one of the most controversial scenes ever produced by the studio, but before you get too excited, the brothers don’t actually have sex with each other, although they do share the same guy and slide their dicks inside the ass each brother has probed before. Lino and Aldo Belucci are the twin brothers you are about to see sliding their uncovered cocks inside the ass of Roald Ekberg. In addition to seeing each other naked, these brothers also watch as their sibling fucks another dude, then he has a turn as well. It’s fascinating watching these twin brothers being so comfortable with each other in such an intimate situation and while there’s no sexual contact between the two of them, it’s still hot watching them interacting with the same guy, taking turns sliding their dicks inside and out of Roald, who is obviously appreciative of the attention he is receiving from the Belucci twins. Watch the full-length video at Bel Ami Online and enjoy many other fine condom-free videos waiting for you to explore while you’re there. You know the videos must be good when Bel Ami was voted XBIZ Gay Studio of the Year for 2015 and Cybersocket Best European Site for 2015!

Lino Belucci, Aldo Belucci and Roald Ekberd - Bel Ami Online
Lino Belucci, Aldo Belucci and Roald Ekberd - Bel Ami Online
Lino Belucci, Aldo Belucci and Roald Ekberd - Bel Ami Online
Lino Belucci, Aldo Belucci and Roald Ekberd - Bel Ami Online
Lino Belucci, Aldo Belucci and Roald Ekberd - Bel Ami Online
Lino Belucci, Aldo Belucci and Roald Ekberd - Bel Ami Online

Want to See More? Click Here to Watch the Full-Length Video at Bel Ami Online!

18 U.S.C. Section 2257 Record-Keeping Requirements Compliance Statement


  1. Hello-

    i do agree with you that Bel Ami produces the best bareback/breeding porn from a European studio. but since the two twins don’t actually have sex i don’t understand why this scene is creating controversy? early last year Bel Ami dropped without prior warning the identical twins who had been their bread and butter for a while and those identical twins actually had sex.

    • Hey Joseph, Bel Ami produces the hottest bareback porn in Europe, that’s for sure! The studio considers this scene to be one of their most controversial scenes ever filmed and I have also seen a few comments on some of the blogs about it as well, but that’s why I pointed out that the twins don’t actually have sex, so it’s not as controversial as it seems, because if the brothers did have sex together, that would definitely have been controversial. I believe that the Peters Twins were removed from the site because they actually had bareback sex with each other and I think for legal reasons the site removed them. I guess this scene featuring the Belucci brothers was as close to them having sex they could without actually having sex to make it compliant with the law. It’s still a very hot scene though and it’s great to see the studio pushing the boundaries to make their porn as hot as possible.

  2. Hello-

    as always your replies are a pleasure to read. i have to say I found the Peters twins quite attractive and excellent on camera sex performers. to which there has to be a REAL reason Bel Ami dropped them. i do not think it was because they were identical twins having sex. i consider myself an intelligent person but for the life of me i don’t see why that would the necessitate the site removing them for “legal” reasons.

    also I apologize for asking this question again. since in the newly posted video the Belucci twins don’t actually have sex i don’t see why its generating controversy? is there something i’m not getting?

    • Hey Joseph, From my understanding, the Peters Twins scenes were removed from the Bel Ami website in 2012 following credit card companies threatening to cease processing transactions for the studio due to “questionably legal content”, as the Peters Twins sex scenes are classified as incest, which is the legal issue. As for the term “controversial” in the Belucci twins scene, this word was used by the studio to describe this scene and I think it has something to do with how close they came to having the twins interacting with each other and bordering the scenes they previously filmed with Milo and Elijah Peters, but without any sexual contact being involved. That’s why I pointed out in my post that they don’t actually have sex, because this doesn’t make it as controversial as it might initially seem.

  3. Hello-

    thanks for the info as to the removal of the Peters twins videos from the site. i have no idea about what legal statutes there are pertaining to incest. but whatever ones there are usually pertain to an adult manipulating a child. but in the case of the Peters twins they were two grown adults. i don’t see how a billing company which is fine with porn to begin with would be that uptight about “questionable legal content”. what’s “questionable legal content”? i seriously doubt there are laws on the books that prohibit two adult brothers having sex and making a video. there has to be why another the Peters twins videos we removed.

    • Hey Joseph, You would be surprised at how the law operates when it comes to the production of adult content and it basically comes down to whether the content is considered obscene to determine whether it’s allowable or not. You can find more about the obscenity law in the United States here:

      Some types of adult porn involving participants at least eighteen years of age that can be considered obscene can include bestiality, incest, rape, scat, watersports to name a few, but the content needs to be put to a test to make an actual determination regarding whether it is considered obscene or objectionable. Here is an extract from the United States Department of Justice that relates to this:

      The U.S. Supreme Court established the test that judges and juries use to determine whether matter is obscene in three major cases: Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 24-25 (1973); Smith v. United States, 431 U.S. 291, 300-02, 309 (1977); and Pope v. Illinois, 481 U.S. 497, 500-01 (1987). The three-pronged Miller test is as follows:

      Whether the average person, applying contemporary adult community standards, finds that the matter, taken as a whole, appeals to prurient interests (i.e., an erotic, lascivious, abnormal, unhealthy, degrading, shameful, or morbid interest in nudity, sex, or excretion);

      Whether the average person, applying contemporary adult community standards, finds that the matter depicts or describes sexual conduct in a patently offensive way (i.e., ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual or simulated, masturbation, excretory functions, lewd exhibition of the genitals, or sado-masochistic sexual abuse); and

      Whether a reasonable person finds that the matter, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.

      Any material that satisfies this three-pronged test may be found obscene.

  4. This is interesting that Bel Ami is going down this road again. I’m not sure how many videos you can do with brothers before its gets boring. Bel Ami made a lot of money off the Peters twins before they fired them, when the heat got too hot. After they removed all their videos from their website, they continued to sell their scenes through their twitter account.

    • Hey Greg, It seems as though the popularity of the Peters twins is behind the decision for Bel Ami to push the boundaries as far as possible without going beyond the limit that is considered allowable. I applaud any studio for trying to make their porn as exciting as possible, but I also agree with you about the repetitive nature having the potential to make the content less exciting. It’s interesting to see Bel Ami producing bareback porn with real-life twin brothers again and I’m curious to see if they try to push the boundaries even further in future updates after gauging the popularity of this scene.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here